A new survey finds shifting views since the start of the #MeToo movement, but not in the ways you might think.
Experts Push Limits Of Science And Tech In Search Of Life On Exoplanets
Last month, NASA's new TESS spacecraft discovered its first confirmed exoplanet. As the roster of planets orbiting distant stars approaches 4,000, some scientists are posing the compelling question: Is there life out there?
For Hilairy Hartnett, a biogeochemist at Arizona State University's School of Earth and Space Exploration (SESE) and School of Molecular Sciences, it's the most natural question on this — or any other — world.
"Who hasn't stood in a relatively dark sky place and looked up at the stars and wondered about them?" She said. "Now we know, when we look up at the stars, they all basically have planets."
Looking for Signs
As of 30 years ago, every known planet orbited Earth's sun. Now, scientists believe distant planets outnumber stars in the sky.
"Super-Earths," "hot Jupiters" and other worlds emerge from the smallest clues: a star wobbling under a planet's gravitational tug, or dimming as its child world passes by or "transits." The more worlds we find, the more we realize how atypical we are.
"The thing I think is really cool about exoplanets in particular is that we have found so many planet types that we don't have in our solar system," said Sara Walker, theoretical physicist, astrobiologist and deputy director of ASU's Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science.
Is there life on these worlds? One way to find out: Use the planet-finding transit method to detect biosignature chemicals in a planet's atmosphere.
"Its atmosphere is essentially backlit by the booming light of its star. And so you can see the signature of the planet atmosphere as the starlight passes through the atmosphere and into our telescopes," said astrophysicist Evgenya Shkolnik of ASU SESE.
But detection alone cannot rule out false positives — or false negatives.
On Earth, it took photosynthetic bacteria to unlock oxygen, but dead planets can make it geochemically. On the other hand, we could miss genuine biosignatures if their star's ultraviolet radiation erases them before detection.
What's more, our timing might be off: A billion years passed on Earth between when life first released oxygen and when it began building up in the atmosphere.
"If we saw the early Earth as an exoplanet, we might not recognize it as an inhabited planet," said Hartnett.
Still, lacking any examples of life beyond Earth, scientists naturally favor rocky planets where conditions support liquid water.
But something more than close-mindedness drives researchers to seek familiar biosignatures such as water, carbon and phosphorus. These substances have special chemical properties that make them suited to supporting life, said Hartnett.
"Water is amazing. I have a whole lecture in my geochemistry class that's title is, 'Why is Water Neat?"
As for carbon, it's a bit like those people who throw great parties because they naturally bond with everyone.
"Carbon can form bonds with itself, it can form bonds with hydrogen, oxygen, sulfur — all those species. And that allows a very wide diversity of molecules to be available," said Hartnett.
Hartnett also explained how phosphorus supports the assembly and vitality of life forms.
"It's both a structural component to our DNA, and it's the one of the molecules that allows us to have an energy currency for our metabolism," she said.
What is Life?
But scientists seeking life light years away must also look beyond the familiar to consider possibilities that are more alien. There's just one problem: We don't really have a workable definition of life. Walker summarized one oft-cited but unofficial NASA definition.
"Life is a self-sustaining chemical system capable of Darwinian evolution," she said, quoting the guideline.
Some view that description as insufficiently abstract, and they have turned to more encompassing descriptions, such as "that which creates order using energy," or "causes disequilibrium" or "imprints patterns on its environment."
Walker is one of them. From her perspective, life is an emergent property, independent of scale and unbounded by chemistry. From her perspective, a city could be considered alive.
"I think whatever explanation there is for life, in order for it to be really universal, will have to necessarily be very abstract just in the same way that most of our fundamental theories of nature are really rather abstract."
Walker sees the search for life on exoplanets as a chance to bracket in what life is and what it isn't — the first-ever statistical sampling of life with a population greater than "us."
"I really just want some constraints on the theory-building, which is very selfish. Most people are really interested in meeting aliens and things. I just want to know what we are and build better theories for life. So give me some constraints!"
A Galaxy of Planets
NASA's Kepler mission discovered thousands of exoplanets. TESS has begun its survey, and the James Webb Space Telescope promises still more data following its launch.
"We're on the verge of answering questions that people have been asking for thousands of years, which I think is a super exciting time to be alive," said Shkolnik.
The past 30 years have revolutionized our understanding of planets. Perhaps a similar transformation awaits our understanding of life.