Lawsuit Seeks To Block Enforcement Of Arizona 'Ballot Harvesting' Ban
A new lawsuit seeks to block Arizona from enforcing its ban on "ballot harvesting'' for the upcoming election.
In legal papers filed in federal court here on Tuesday, attorney Spencer Scharff argued that only Congress has the right to regulate the U.S. mail., and that once someone puts a ballot into an envelope which has prepaid postage on it, it becomes "mail.''
This is a direct challenge to a 2016 statute that makes it a felony to collect early ballots and deliver them to polling places as preempted by federal law.
There was no immediate response from Attorney General Mark Brnovich who is named as defendant in the lawsuit. Rayes is scheduled to talk with attorneys from both sides about the lawsuit this coming week.
Until 2016, both major parties had engaged in some form of the practice. But it was the Democrats and political allies who were more active, going out and canvassing neighborhoods, particularly in Democratic areas, to boost voter turnout.
The 2016 law, pushed by Republican lawmakers, makes it a felony to handle anyone else's early ballot, with violators subject to a year in state prison and a $150,000 fine. Proponents of HB 2023 said it was designed to preclude fraud, or even the potential of fraud.
Earlier this year, U.S. District Court Judge Douglas Rayes threw out a challenge brought by the Arizona Democratic Party and others. The judge rejected their claims that the law will create a hardship, particularly for minorities.
And while Rayes said there has never been a case of voter fraud associated with ballot collection, the Legislature "need not wait until a problem occurs to take proactive steps it deems appropriate.''
That case is on appeal with a hearing set before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals later this month.
This new lawsuit is based on a more basic legal question of whether the state has any authority to enact such a law.
"HB 2023's prohibition against collecting and delivering a voted or unvoted early ballot constitutes the regulation of U.S. Mail,'' Scharff wrote in the new lawsuit.
The lawsuit is being brought on behalf of Rivko Knox, a member of the League of Women Voters of Arizona and also a precinct committee person for the Democratic Party.
According to the legal papers, Knox makes a regular habit of going door-to-door, whether an election year or not, to register voters, raise awareness of candidates and encourage participation in the democratic process.
More to the point, Scharff said Knox encourages voters to fill out and mail their early ballots. And until the law took effect in 2016, he said Knox would deliver the early ballot of someone who made a request for her to do that.
There are some exemptions to the 2016 law and its penalties.
It does not apply to family members related to a voter by blood, marriage, adoption or legal guardianship. People who reside in the same home also can hand deliver someone else's ballot, as can a "caregiver'' who works with people in nursing homes, assisted living facilities, or similar places.
Howard Fischer of Capitol Media Services contributed to this report.